80VPS - 48元 Xen 384M 20G 250G 佛利蒙HE
2012-02-12 Xen , 弗里蒙特 , 80vps.com

80VPS是一家国人VPS服务商,采用Xen架构支持win2003系统,新增佛利蒙HE数据中心,终生8折码:he201202购买384方案仅 ¥48元/月(购买链接)配置如下:

  • 384MB guaranteed and 256MB swap memory
  • 20GB storage
  • 250GB/month data transfer on 5Mbps
  • Xen/Xensystem

##佛利蒙HE 测试IP:184.105.139.222 - 100mb.test - php探针 - info探针

还经营香港、圣何塞T2、洛杉矶等数据中心VPS,以下是小夜真实评测数据:

cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor	: 0
vendor_id	: GenuineIntel
cpu family	: 6
model		: 30
model name	: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU           X3440  @ 2.53GHz
stepping	: 5
cpu MHz		: 2533.332
cache size	: 8192 KB
fdiv_bug	: no
hlt_bug		: no
f00f_bug	: no
coma_bug	: no
fpu		: yes
fpu_exception	: yes
cpuid level	: 11
wp		: yes
flags		: fpu de tsc msr pae cx8 apic cmov pat clflush acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht nx 
constant_tsc nonstop_tsc pni ssse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt [8]
bogomips	: 6334.92

free -m
             total       used       free     shared    buffers     cached
Mem:           512        368        143          0         11        272
-/+ buffers/cache:         84        427
Swap:          255          0        255

dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 5.18974 seconds, 51.7 MB/s
dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 4.44827 seconds, 60.3 MB/s
dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 4.30189 seconds, 62.4 MB/s

wget http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
--2012-02-12 16:41:17--  http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net... 205.234.175.175
Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: `100mb.test'
100%[===================>] 104,857,600 11.1M/s   in 9.0s   
2012-02-12 16:41:26 (11.1 MB/s) - `100mb.test' saved [104857600/104857600]

========================================================================
   BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2)

   System: MyVPS: GNU/Linux
   OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.18-238.5.1.el5xen -- #1 SMP Fri Apr 1 20:27:35 EDT 2011
   Machine: i686 (i386)
   Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
   CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3440 @ 2.53GHz (6334.9 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, MMX, Physical Address Ext
   CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3440 @ 2.53GHz (6334.9 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, MMX, Physical Address Ext
   16:53:33 up 22:57,  1 user,  load average: 0.08, 0.27, 0.58; runlevel 3

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sun Feb 12 2012 16:53:33 - 17:21:24
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       11044752.3 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     2278.4 MWIPS (10.2 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               2041.6 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        446457.4 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          120114.0 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       1270075.7 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                              663796.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                  98721.6 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                               4141.4 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   3952.8 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    855.5 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                         477619.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   11044752.3    946.4
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       2278.4    414.3
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       2041.6    474.8
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     446457.4   1127.4
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     120114.0    725.8
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    1270075.7   2189.8
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0     663796.8    533.6
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0      98721.6    246.8
Process Creation                                126.0       4141.4    328.7
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       3952.8    932.3
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        855.5   1425.8
System Call Overhead                          15000.0     477619.8    318.4
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                         653.9

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sun Feb 12 2012 17:21:24 - 17:49:18
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       21944578.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     4531.7 MWIPS (10.2 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               4101.3 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        222609.9 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           59730.4 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        772097.3 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             1315752.4 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 214052.1 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                               7973.1 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   6321.5 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    944.6 lpm   (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                         926893.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   21944578.8   1880.4
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       4531.7    823.9
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       4101.3    953.8
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     222609.9    562.1
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0      59730.4    360.9
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0     772097.3   1331.2
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    1315752.4   1057.7
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     214052.1    535.1
Process Creation                                126.0       7973.1    632.8
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       6321.5   1490.9
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        944.6   1574.3
System Call Overhead                          15000.0     926893.8    617.9
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                         877.1

========================================================================

##佛利蒙HE 测试IP:184.105.139.222 - 100mb.test - php探针 - info探针

  • 序号
  • Ping的地点
  • 响应IP
  • 响应时间
  • TTL
  • 1
  • 襄阳[电信]
  • 184.105.139.222
  • 382毫秒
  • 52
  • 2
  • 南宁[电信]
  • 184.105.139.222
  • 284毫秒
  • 50
  • 3
  • 厦门[电信]
  • 184.105.139.222
  • 287毫秒
  • 51
  • 4
  • 山东[联通]
  • 184.105.139.222
  • 237毫秒
  • 51
  • 5
  • 福州[电信]
  • 184.105.139.222
  • 276毫秒
  • 52
  • 6
  • 宁波[电信]
  • 184.105.139.222
  • 252毫秒
  • 51
  • 7
  • 合肥[电信]
  • 184.105.139.222
  • 339毫秒
  • 50
  • 8
  • 乐山[电信]
  • 184.105.139.222
  • 379毫秒
  • 51
  • 9
  • 丽水[电信]
  • 184.105.139.222
  • 297毫秒
  • 49
  • 10
  • 商丘[联通]
  • 184.105.139.222
  • 200毫秒
  • 50
  • 11
  • 安徽[移动]
  • 184.105.139.222
  • 196毫秒
  • 46
  • 12
  • 绵阳[电信]
  • 184.105.139.222
  • 396毫秒
  • 52
  • 13
  • 杭州[电信]
  • 184.105.139.222
  • 363毫秒
  • 50
  • 14
  • 东莞[电信]
  • 184.105.139.222
  • 288毫秒
  • 50
  • 15
  • 天津[联通]
  • 184.105.139.222
  • 220毫秒
  • 51
  • 16
  • 郑州[联通]
  • 184.105.139.222
  • 217毫秒
  • 49
  • 17
  • 昆明[电信]
  • 184.105.139.222
  • 206毫秒
  • 52
  • 18
  • 上海[移动]
  • 184.105.139.222
  • 188毫秒
  • 49
  • 19
  • 德阳[电信]
  • 184.105.139.222
  • 303毫秒
  • 51
  • 20
  • 辽宁[联通]
  • 184.105.139.222
  • 208毫秒
  • 51
  • 21
  • 福建[移动]
  • 184.105.139.222
  • 202毫秒
  • 47
最快:上海[移动] 188 毫秒 ## 最慢:绵阳[电信] 396 毫秒
电信平均:313 毫秒 ## 联通平均:216 毫秒

  1. vaeye vaeye

    试试看···

  2. 黑帽博客 黑帽博客

    怎么不是48元,是60元啊

  3. 80vps 80vps

    ls的朋友请注意,这次只是是he机房的优惠码。必须选择he机房输入优惠码才会有效

  4. 小乱 小乱

    小夜 我想问你的这个连接http://www.vpsmm.com/go-80vps.html 怎么弄的 我博客发地址就是显示的推广连接 ,我也想弄下你这样的

    1. 小夜 小夜

      用的短网址程序+自定义伪静态规则,参考:419.AT

    2. 小乱 小乱

      我新手、关注你博客好长时间了 ,没有介绍SEO得 ,好想看你写的SEO文章,你说的用短网址程序,意思我也下载个程序搭建起来??? 自定义伪静态规则 怎么弄呢,能否详细点阿 小夜

  5. Beautyleg Beautyleg

    这家首页有个大bug,不知道你们发现没有

  6. 80vps 80vps

    Beautyleg 朋友。不吝赐教。是什么问题?

  7. Xss Xss

    小夜,流量大跟流量少有什么区别啊,我看他流量都是一个250G的。

    1. 小夜 小夜

      这个就要估计一下,你一个月网站的流量,和大概带宽。一般250G流量,5万PV的普通站,不多图情况下,没有任何问题。

Leave a Reply

如果您是第一次在本站留言,需要审核后才会显示内容!