快易互联 - 79元/月 Xen 4核 1024M 40G 800G 芝加哥
2013-04-21 Xen , 芝加哥 , kiiyi.com

快易互联是中国VPS主机商,采用XenServer架构,操作系统支持L/W全系列,新增数据中心芝加哥(速度不错),无码直购cx1g方案 ¥79元/月(购买链接)配置如下:

  • 4 CPU Cores, 1024MB RAM
  • 40GB Raid10 DiskSpace
  • 800GB Bandwidth @ 100Mbps
  • XenServer/IdcSystem

川哥家新增的数据中心,评测数据十分优秀,目前已经达到了10个DC,余下还包括:香港、美国KT、洛杉矶webnx/psychz/mc/ubi/pr、圣何塞、达拉斯、江苏电信等。

kiiyi.com 芝加哥 测试IP:199.192.204.225

cat /etc/issue
CentOS release 5.6 (Final)
Kernel \r on an \m
free -m
             total       used       free     shared    buffers     cached
Mem:           512        493         18          0         19        386
-/+ buffers/cache:         88        424
Swap:          255          0        255

cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor	: 0
vendor_id	: GenuineIntel
cpu family	: 6
model		: 58
model name	: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 V2 @ 3.50GHz
stepping	: 9
cpu MHz		: 3492.066
cache size	: 8192 KB
fdiv_bug	: no
hlt_bug		: no
f00f_bug	: no
coma_bug	: no
fpu		: yes
fpu_exception	: yes
cpuid level	: 13
wp		: yes
flags		: fpu de tsc msr pae cx8 apic cmov pat clflush acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht nx
 constant_tsc nonstop_tsc pni ssse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt [8]
bogomips	: 8731.55

processor	: 1
vendor_id	: GenuineIntel
cpu family	: 6
model		: 58
model name	: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 V2 @ 3.50GHz
stepping	: 9
cpu MHz		: 3492.066
cache size	: 8192 KB
fdiv_bug	: no
hlt_bug		: no
f00f_bug	: no
coma_bug	: no
fpu		: yes
fpu_exception	: yes
cpuid level	: 13
wp		: yes
flags		: fpu de tsc msr pae cx8 apic cmov pat clflush acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht nx
 constant_tsc up nonstop_tsc pni ssse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt [8]
bogomips	: 8731.55

dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 2.95248 seconds, 90.9 MB/s
dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 2.98898 seconds, 89.8 MB/s
dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 3.15219 seconds, 85.2 MB/s
dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 3.2866 seconds, 81.7 MB/s

wget http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
--2013-04-21 01:47:15--  http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net... 205.234.175.175
Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: `100mb.test'
2013-04-21 01:47:24 (11.2 MB/s) - `100mb.test' saved [104857600/104857600]

===========================================================
   BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2)

   System: MyVPS: GNU/Linux
   OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.18-238.5.1.el5xen -- #1 SMP Fri Apr 1 20:27:35 EDT 2011
   Machine: i686 (i386)
   Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
   CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 V2 @ 3.50GHz (8731.5 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, MMX, Physical Address Ext
   CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 V2 @ 3.50GHz (8731.5 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, MMX, Physical Address Ext
   01:47:33 up 21 min,  1 user,  load average: 1.44, 1.36, 0.82; runlevel 3

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sun Apr 21 2013 01:47:33 - 02:15:43
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       19582872.3 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     3065.7 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               3076.5 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        628523.6 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          166876.4 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       1894694.6 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                              910204.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 143416.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                               6405.8 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   5936.4 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   1252.0 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                         637841.6 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   19582872.3   1678.1
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       3065.7    557.4
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       3076.5    715.5
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     628523.6   1587.2
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     166876.4   1008.3
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    1894694.6   3266.7
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0     910204.0    731.7
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     143416.0    358.5
Process Creation                                126.0       6405.8    508.4
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       5936.4   1400.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       1252.0   2086.6
System Call Overhead                          15000.0     637841.6    425.2
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                         955.6

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sun Apr 21 2013 02:15:43 - 02:43:55
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       39121632.3 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     6134.5 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               5997.0 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        352253.9 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          101819.7 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       1432634.2 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             1821005.4 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 287111.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                              11841.3 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   9429.8 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   1494.2 lpm   (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        1238048.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   39121632.3   3352.3
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       6134.5   1115.4
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       5997.0   1394.7
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     352253.9    889.5
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     101819.7    615.2
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    1432634.2   2470.1
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    1821005.4   1463.8
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     287111.8    717.8
Process Creation                                126.0      11841.3    939.8
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       9429.8   2224.0
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       1494.2   2490.3
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    1238048.2    825.4
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        1334.2

kiiyi.com 芝加哥 测试IP:199.192.204.225

  • 序号
  • Ping的地点
  • 响应IP
  • 响应时间
  • TTL
  • 1
  • 香港[电信]
  • 199.192.204.225
  • 225毫秒
  • 53
  • 2
  • 四川德阳[电信]
  • 199.192.204.225
  • 259毫秒
  • 49
  • 3
  • 四川绵阳[电信]
  • 199.192.204.225
  • 286毫秒
  • 51
  • 4
  • 深圳[电信]
  • 199.192.204.225
  • 213毫秒
  • 49
  • 5
  • 安徽淮北[电信]
  • 199.192.204.225
  • 206毫秒
  • 50
  • 6
  • 江苏镇江[电信]
  • 199.192.204.225
  • 202毫秒
  • 49
  • 7
  • 四川遂宁[电信]
  • 199.192.204.225
  • 316毫秒
  • 51
  • 8
  • 上海[电信]
  • 199.192.204.225
  • 180毫秒
  • 50
  • 9
  • 江苏无锡[电信]
  • 199.192.204.225
  • 189毫秒
  • 48
  • 10
  • 广东东莞[电信]
  • 199.192.204.225
  • 214毫秒
  • 49
  • 11
  • 陕西西安[电信]
  • 199.192.204.225
  • 323毫秒
  • 50
  • 12
  • 江西[电信]
  • 199.192.204.225
  • 233毫秒
  • 50
  • 13
  • 江苏扬州[电信]
  • 199.192.204.225
  • 197毫秒
  • 50
  • 14
  • 云南昆明[电信]
  • 199.192.204.225
  • 235毫秒
  • 51
  • 15
  • 上海[多线]
  • 199.192.204.225
  • 368毫秒
  • 47
  • 16
  • 北京[多线]
  • 199.192.204.225
  • 357毫秒
  • 47
  • 17
  • 河南郑州[多线]
  • 199.192.204.225
  • 402毫秒
  • 49
  • 18
  • 辽宁[联通]
  • 199.192.204.225
  • 379毫秒
  • 53
  • 19
  • 北京[联通]
  • 199.192.204.225
  • 398毫秒
  • 42
  • 20
  • 宁波[联通]
  • 199.192.204.225
  • 262毫秒
  • 49
  • 21
  • 安徽滁州[联通]
  • 199.192.204.225
  • 441毫秒
  • 50
  • 22
  • 深圳[联通]
  • 199.192.204.225
  • 374毫秒
  • 51
  • 23
  • 河南[联通]
  • 199.192.204.225
  • 464毫秒
  • 52
  • 24
  • 江苏[联通]
  • 199.192.204.225
  • 407毫秒
  • 51
  • 25
  • 上海[联通]
  • 199.192.204.225
  • 372毫秒
  • 50
  • 26
  • 厦门[联通]
  • 199.192.204.225
  • 387毫秒
  • 53
  • 27
  • 天津[联通]
  • 199.192.204.225
  • 394毫秒
  • 45
  • 28
  • 江苏[移动]
  • 199.192.204.225
  • 249毫秒
  • 49
  • 29
  • 福建厦门[移动]
  • 199.192.204.225
  • 235毫秒
  • 50
  • 30
  • 上海[移动]
  • 199.192.204.225
  • 232毫秒
  • 53
  • 31
  • 河北[移动]
  • 199.192.204.225
  • 263毫秒
  • 50
  • 32
  • 深圳[移动]
  • 199.192.204.225
  • 238毫秒
  • 50
最快:上海[电信] 180 毫秒 ### 最慢:河南[联通] 464 毫秒
电信平均:234 毫秒 ### 联通平均:387 毫秒

  1. PIAOF PIAOF

    夜妹妹,芝加哥的线路好嘛

    1. 小夜 小夜

      电信优秀,联通差一些,没办法,芝加哥在美国中部,距离有点远。速度垦定要慢于洛杉矶。

Leave a Reply

如果您是第一次在本站留言,需要审核后才会显示内容!